Відео

I want one but $4,000 plus is not acceptable.

Wow! Beautiful! But way too much work, lol!

Have an XLT version deforked recently. Put it on AM5. Works like a charm, much more manageable as tube itself is about 18 KG. Love it!

Noob here with genuine question on moon watchers... Even if you have a +50k$ telescope, what is the fun of watching the moon once you already spend +40 hours watching it in various lighting/phase conditions? Don't get me wrong, it's one of the most beautiful/impressive space object with incredible details, but it doesn't change much and once you have all your great pictures, what else is keeping you into the hobby? Sure, you also can get the other planets and various objects, but even then... Aren't they all very subtle variation of themself once you have spend some time on them? This summer, I went to my local observatory and spend an awesome night until 4hAM with club members. I wish more peoples get this experience once in their life. But when I compare... I started microscopy few months ago...🔬 Even if I watch two soil/water sample, I'm garantie I will have a lot of different shape/size and comportment. I can even induce stimulus to provoke change, etc. I can also use the scope to make various health diagnostic. It can be use 24/7 and with a 300$ instrument, you can enjoy the hobby for the rest of your life.🦠

I agree with your prediction that if this model is successful, we'll see an 8" and 10" in the future.

collimation hell?

Great review. Yes, it looks amazing. But, I still love my Seestar. I can take it anywhere. Though the Origin's image quality is very impressive.

This mount is a total junk. It's cheaper, but it's totally useless. Very difficult or impossible to polar align, and no matter how well you do it, you still have star trails on exposures longer than 10 sec. It wobbles, no matter what you do. The original tripod is weak and very unstable. If you want to throw the money out the window, buy it.

Why no pictures of the sky through this telescope

In France this is NINE times more expensive compared to the Seestar S50. Is it that much better though? I don't think so

I looked through a 45" at a star party many years ago and that one blew me away! I can only imagine how impressive the 70" views are.

Thank you for your excellent review. The Origin is impressive instrument but so is the little Seestar in its own way. I also imaged M 17 from my Bortle 6/7 backyard and compared my results with the image shown in the video. While the Origin outperforms the Seestar, the Seestar image is 'almost as good' and both instruments certainly provide better views than I've ever seen through an eyepiece.

Hi i will be Reciving my tomorrow and wanted yor opinion on what filter will you recommend to se objets and planets whit my kid and family I do have this ones: Celestron 93624 Narrowband Oxygen III 2 Filter, Celestron 94124 2-Inch UHC/LPR Filter, Celestron 94305 Two-inch Eyepiece and Filter Kit, Orion 5562 2-Inch Variable Polarizing Eyepiece Filterand I know you liked Optolong L-eXtreme F2, and it is one of my next buys if I share to buy 2 more filter what will be your opinion?

Can the app go in to night app mode? My astro club will kill me if I have a non-red app driving the scope!

Tx for the video, will be checking for next version, the camera is not worth the price tag for me.

I bought one and I love it. I have an 11”SCT and the Origin was an easy way to get into astrophotography. The images are terrific.

I really wish one of these companies would release a smart telescope specifically for moon and planetary imaging

I have a few issues with this telescope. First is the cost. Secondly, what about field rotation from what I presume is an Alt-Az mount. How would it run if you threw it on a wedge? And, of course, the added expense of said wedge. Overall, it’s a good video and I was curious about this unit. I have a SeeStar and it cost $100.00 to throw it on an EQ mount. With the EQ mount, I’ve images a target for 2 hours straight with no field rotation and zero frames rejected. To me, who also owns a full size Edge HD8 with HyperStar, it’s not worth the price.

I found one at a thrift store that missing the knob that hold the tube to the base. Do you know what size that knob is? Thanks

How many mounts do you have? In your videos, I have counted 5 mounts.

I am buying the ipad Pro13 M4. Which ipad case do you use?

ZWO AM5 with tripod $2298.00 Apertura Carbon Star 150 $849.00 ASI 533MC Pro $799.00 Optolong L Extreme $309.00 Sharpcap with live stacking $18.00 Total $4274.94 Better telescope, better equatorial mount, better filter, better camera, better stacking.

Nice video, thanks.. I hope for a biger sensor cammera..

The T-Rex was the icing on the cake...9:50

I have a cgx that went to celestron years back because it had the runaway issue. Now it behaves but I do have that weird vibration noise like you first showed. I'm going to have to try your technique.

Can't find telescope position! Point telescope at a clear area of sky.

Me who doesn't have $4000 dollars: very interesting indeed

your very good

very loud

The cable to the camera is to BIG. It should half that size. Also the camera is TOO small.

Excellent review. Thank you! Awesome scope. Please review the Vespera Pro!

Very nice review. Thank you! Question: do you have to level the tripod and calibrate the compass before each use for the goto to work accurately like on the Seestar? Also, what about lunar tracking and solar tracking (solar filter?)?

What gets me is that there are other smart telescopes in the same price but lower specs and people praise those but then people are so critical of this...

I wanted the Celestron Origin, but it's too heavy and bulky. I got the <10 pounds Seestar S50 instead and pocketed the rest. I do love the electro-mechanical sounds the Origin makes when it's in operation.

Which Ipad do you use? How do you get WIFI in the middle of nowhere? Which Sky Safari app do you use?

6 hours isn't all night. It's only part of it. The camera is sub par for DSO imaging. AZ mount do i need to go on.

4K . Not a chance 👎👎👎

I bought it and think it’s awesome. I own many telescopes, and think that it is a great machine. Very impressive for what it is. It’s totally easy to use.

Something fishy about this scope. Bortle 8 and you getting those images? Seems like it is downloading them from celestron. Would be interesting to see if it still pulls this without any internet data connection, but then again it could plate solve and pull the images from internal memory. Which would explain why the AI images it produces look so artificial.

Thank you. Great video. Have the Seestar and trying to decide on Origin. This helped

Really need to see how jupiter looks in it

Nutty price

Since last 5 months, i wait unprecedentedly for reviews start showing up so i could definitely take my final pic between Origin and Vespera Pro. 3 weeks ago i took a sudden turn and choose the hard path and begin my Astrophotography crusade and bought a basic rig under CA2.7k including used Canon M6. Now, thanks to your review and final thoughts, i feel just more confident about my decision since i needed that feeling of getting rewarded for my efforts; in which for sure after few weeks i wouldn't probably feel anymore with smart telescopes of any kind. Awesome detailed review!! Thanks!

Nice review. Good job!

thanks for the review

Can you see craters on the moon with it?

I still feel you loose something when the photons of the distant object are not hitting you retina. Nothing goes further then to connect me with distant objects then to have their actual light in my eyes. Let alone use A.I. to aid in image generation. I want to be able to actually see my targets.

Well done on the review mate. Damo

never mind , in alta zimuth you cant track your target correctly because the telescope cant rotate the camera , other issue is the thick wires in front of the telescope distort the stars , and your are limited because the power , in equatorial mounts you can use variety of telescopes

Would have been worth it if it used sensor like the IMX676, IMX585 or even IMX715 which could get smaller objects like galaxies! I used a IMX715 in my RASA8 and could even image objects as small as M57! One of those camera and a wedge and you really don't need anything else! The benefit of the IMX676 is 2um pixels x 12MP and ultra low dark current noise so no need for cooling. Thanks for the review!